The 2020 School of Medicine Appointments, Promotion and Tenure (APT) Tracks guidance is the culmination of an extensive effort to articulate a contemporary framework that supports the career aspirations of faculty. The guidance is intended to bring greater clarity to the question “what does Duke value?” – the depth and breadth of the scholarship that we want to reward, the expectation of wide-ranging influence reflecting our vision, the embracing of alternative (non-traditional) scholarship, and the prioritization of scholarship and impact as the key drivers of promotion.
In recognition of the far-ranging interests, talents, and pursuits of faculty supporting the Duke mission, multiple dimensions of alternative scholarship are valued in the promotion process. Specifically, the documents below describe expectations, requirements, and documentation to support the evaluation of non-traditional scholarship in the domains of digital scholarship, advocacy, and team science. Additional content may be added in the future as concepts about non-traditional scholarship are further developed and refined.
- Advocacy Scholarship Framework
- Digital Scholarship Framework
- Justice, Equity, Diversity, Antiracism, and Inclusion (JEDAI) Scholarship Framework
- Team Science Scholarship Framework
- Boyer EL. Scholarship Reconsidered - Priorities of the Professoriate
- Earnest MA et al. Perspective: Physician Advocacy: What Is It and How Do We Do It?
- Fried JE et al. Advocacy: Achieving Physician Competency
- Nerlinger AL et al. The Advocacy Portfolio: A Standardized Tool for Documenting Physician Advocacy
- Rothenberg D, Lukolyo H. Effective Advocacy for Patients and Communities
- Cabrera D et al. More Than Likes and Tweets: Creating Social Media Portfolios for Academic Promotion and Tenure
- McHale SM et al. Promotion and Tenure Policies for Team Science at Colleges/Schools of Medicine