The goals of the Office of Physician-Scientist Development are to:
- Develop a sustainable pipeline for physician-scientists in the School of Medicine
- Coordinate physician-scientist development and community across the School of Medicine
- Provide infrastructure and resources for physician-scientists in the School of Medicine
- Increase the number of MDs and MD/PhDs who pursue, succeed, and are retained in basic, clinical, and translational research
OPSD Scholars Concierge Career Mentorship Program
The OPSD Scholars program is for residents, fellows, and junior faculty physician-scientists who have indicated a desire for additional career mentorship in addition to their clinical and research mentorship. As part of the OPSD Scholars Concierge Mentorship program, you have the opportunity to gain mentorship from a Master Mentor in your desired area of research who will provide a wealth of knowledge to support your early investigative career. OPSD also offers mentor consultation services for Medical Students.
To enroll in the OPSD Scholars Concierge Mentorship program,
Resources for Scholars
OPSD Concept Review
OPSD offers concept reviews only to physician-scientist trainees and junior faculty registered in OPSD Scholars who do not have access to a department-run research development or concept review program. If the scholar is unsure about whether they have access to departmental resources, they should inquire with their OPSD Scholars Coordinator and Master Mentor. Participants must commit to providing a draft specific aims page (pre-vetted by a research mentor) at least one week in advance of the scheduled concept review meeting.
The purpose is to identify weaknesses in the scientific concepts early on that can be fixed via changes in strategies, presentation, new collaborations, or improved use of available resources. This program can be used to vet grants of any size (e.g., K01, K23, R03, R01) and is most useful in the early stages of grant planning, before expending much time writing.
What is a “Concept Review”?
Investigators present their proposed scientific grant idea to a small group of established investigators with relevant expertise and participate in an open discussion with their specific aims page as the starting point
Process for Concept Review Set-Up:
- At least 2-3 months before the submission due date, the investigator contacts OPSD with the following information:
- Whether their research is basic, clinical, or translational
- The name and submission date of the award they are applying for
- The title of their proposal
- The name of their mentor(s) and 5-6 investigators from anywhere within Duke University who have expertise relevant to the subject matter: investigators are encouraged to think outside of the box here.
- What days and times the investigator is available for a 90-minute review within the next 3-4 weeks
- The senior basic or clinical faculty lead looks over the suggested SOM reviewers and adds suggestions as needed
- OPSD contacts reviewers to set a date/time for the review session
- Reviewers receive the Specific Aims page of the investigator one week prior to the review session
- The overall format for this 90-minute concept review session is as follows:
- The investigator presents an outline of the grant (including the background, preliminary data, and research plan) via PowerPoint to a small group of Duke investigators whose expertise aligns with the proposed research (3-5 reviewers total)
- Following the presentation, the group provides feedback through an open discussion focused on identifying possible problems and offering suggestions to improve the planned proposal
- The OPSD Scholars Coordinator will complete a concept review outcome form to provide notes and feedback after the review session
For more information on the concept review process, including eligibility and program requirements, please email firstname.lastname@example.org .
Research Careers Ahead! Professional Development Series
The Research Careers Ahead! Professional Development Series aims to inspire students, trainees and junior faculty to embrace a research career. Each session will equip participants with knowledge and skills needed to develop a robust research program as well as provide an opportunity for professional networking with other scientists. Sessions generally occur the 4th Wednesday of each month at 4pm. Complete this survey to affect future programming topics.
Register Here for upcoming seminars.
November 18, 2020, 4-5pm *Please note, due to the holiday, this event will occur on the 3rd Wednesday
Keys to Success as a Physician-Scientist
R. Sanders Williams, MD
Professor & Dean Emeritus, Senior Advisor for Science and Technology
To view prior seminars, please see the links below:
Finding Funding, Onboarding and Research Navigator Services - Sunita Patil, PhD (October 28, 2020)
In this interactive session, Dr. Sunita Patil provides information about the resources and services available to research community, navigation and onboarding services, as well as connect attendees to relevant resources available in the MRH portal. View links and resources covered in this session here.
Grant Writing as Your Vision of a Future - Irina Mokrova, PhD (September 23, 2020)
The goal of a well-written grant is to convince the reviewers that you can deliver a better future. To do it effectively, you need to know who your audience is, how they judge a grant, and what can make them excited about your vision of that future. Thus, in addition to an innovative idea, your grant needs to convey an attractive story, targeted to a particular audience. During this talk, we will discuss how do grants get funded, how to tailor your writing to your audience, and examine the "Cs" of effective grant writing (creating text that is clear, compelling, consistent, and concise) as well as discuss writing as a skill that needs practice, and tips that can help you become a better writer. View links and resources covered in this session here.
How to Budget and Manage Grant Finances - Deborah Martin (August 26, 2020)
In this session, Deborah Martin, Senior Grants Manager, provides an overview of the administrative aspect of grant submission and post-award management. Topics include the role of the grant administrator and central offices, managing submission deliverables and deadlines, budget preparation, navigating both Duke and sponsor requirements, and critical components of managing an award. View links and resources covered in this session here.
Best Practices in Research Project and Proposal Development - Dr. Michael Gunn (July 22, 2020)
In the first of our Fall 2020 Grant Writing Series, Dr. Gunn presents a strategy and workflow that will enhance your ability to develop research projects and will markedly improve the quality of your grant applications. Common mistakes will be discussed, along with the best way to avoid them. View links and resources covered in this session here.
Navigating NIH Policies and Guidelines During COVID19 - Dr. Geeta Swamy and Laurianne Torres (June 24, 2020)
This session examines the impact of COVID19 on the grant proposal submission and acceptance process, and review the current guidance from NIH and other sponsors on early stage investigator status, submission timelines, carryforward and no-cost extensions as well as existing guidelines per the NIH grant policy statement. The audience will be oriented on the research administration infrastructure and required processes at Duke. View links and resources covered in this session here.
In this town hall discusion, panelists Dr. Ann J. Brown, Vice Dean for Faculty and Professor of Medicine, Dr. Andrew Alspaugh, Vice Chair, Academic Affairs and Professor of Medicine, and Catherine Liao, Associate Vice President, Duke Health Government Relations provide brief updates on COVID-19 response and recovery plans from a physician-scientist career perspective as well as address questions related to your unique career support needs during this unprecedented time. View links and resources covered in this session here.
Sharing Your Science Effectively - Karl Bates and Dr. Jory Weintraub (April 22, 2020)
Join us as we help you create a clear, smooth, and compelling introduction that reaches people where THEY are.
Tracking Scholarship + Compliance: ORCID, SciENcv, and the NIH Public Access Policy - Karen Barton and Sarah Cantrell (March 25, 2020)
In this session, we will provide a big picture overview of the ways you can track your scholarship, build biosketches and meaningful personal statements, and ensure compliance with funding agencies.
Running a Successful Lab - Sally Kornbluth, Provost and Jo Rae Wright Univeristy Professor (February 26, 2020)
Join us as Provost Sally Kornbluth discusses all of the elements for success in scientific research—how to hire and manage people, how to select areas of focus, how to budget (time and money!) and how to navigate scientific publishing and meetings.
Effective Team Leadership in the Research Environment - Dr. Mitch Heflin (January 29, 2020)
Join us as Dr. Mitchell Heflin reviews the key elements of effective team building, with an emphasis on working across professions and disciplines
Strategies for Navigating the Academic Job Market - Dr. Lola Fayanju and Dr. Andrew Landstom (November 20, 2019)
Join us as Drs. Landstrom and Fayanju focus on practical tips and advice on the transition from the end of training to a faculty position from a first-hand perspective.
Creating a Curriculum Vitae - Dr. Katie Garman (October 23, 2019)
Learn how to tailor a CV to a specific project, and when to use a CV versus resume
Maximizing the Mentor/Mentee Relationship - Dr. Richard Liddle, Dr. Diego Bohorquez and Kelly Buchanan (September 25, 2019)
See how three generations of mentors and mentees present the ingredients for getting the best out of a mentoring relationship
In Pursuit of Hypothesis-Driven Research - Dr. Gerry Blobe (August 28, 2019)
In this seminar, Dr. Blobe covers how the hypothesis fits into the scientific method, how to transition from an idea to a hypothesis, how to structure a hypothesis-driven question, writing and developing a hypothesis, and experimental design to address a hypothesis.
Enhancing Your Visibility as a Scientist - Dr. Matthew Sparks (June 26, 2019)
Making the Most of the Mentoring Relationship - Dr. Cathleen Colon-Emeric (May 22, 2019)
Anatomy of a Scientific Paper - Dr. Andrew Alspaugh (March 27, 2019)
OPSD Monthly Newsletter
Physician-Scientist Training Program
OPSD offers Guidelines for the Development of Department-Level Physician-Scientist Training Programs (PSTP). The overall goal of a Department-Level PSTP is to identify and train the next generation of physician-scientist. To this end, each program should provide support for mentor identification, scholarship oversight committees, individual development plans, and resources for conducting research.
- Identify trainees interested in a research career
- Provide program leadership by established physician scientists with active research portfolios
- Include funded physician-scientists as part of residency program leadership
- Facilitate PI status for trainees applying for funding
- Program Manager (MS / PhD level) for program operations and metrics
- Facilitate mentor identification, oversight of scholarly activities and training in scientific communications and grant writing
- Evaluate and support specialty-specific training needs
- Offer a residency track that provides protected research time
- Refer research oriented trainees to OPSD for training, mentorship, funding opportunities and research support programs
Other Valuable Duke Resources
Grant Writing Resources
Gopen Writing Seminars (held annually in October/November), presented by the Office for Faculty Development: “Writing from the Reader's Perspective,” a full day seminar based on the concept that in order to improve writing, it is first necessary to understand the process of reading. The ideas presented in this workshop have changed participants' writing habits permanently, often resulting in improved grant-writing and publication success. Registration is first-come, first-served with priority given to faculty participants.
Write Winning Grant Proposals (held annually in July), presented by the Office for Faculty Development: This full-day, widely acclaimed seminar comprehensively addresses both practical and conceptual aspects that are important to the proposal-writing process. Strategies designed to merit a fundable priority score are emphasized. Registration is first-come, first-served with priority given to faculty participants.
Beyond NIH Funding: Note that many foundations and professional societies offer funding that particularly supports early career investigators as they establish their preliminary data for future success in seeking larger NIH proposals. For valuable insights and input, we recommend contacting a faculty member who has served on a foundation or professional society committee or who has been successfully funded by the organization to which you are applying.
Grant Writing Workshop- Directed by Dr. David Harpole
This course is a guide in creating a research plan with and approved by a preceptor prior to the formal preparation of an application for an NIH F32 National Research Service Award or an NIH K38 “Stimulating Access to Research in Residency Transition Support" award. Participants will meet monthly starting in June and continue through March. Participants have been successful in obtaining these grants after completing the workshop. Participation offers, connections and ideas from your peers, as well as guidance from various leaders in the research community. For more informatin on this workshop, please email Jennie Phillips.
Responsible Conduct in Research
The Duke Faculty and Staff RCR Program strengthens our foundation in research integrity and ethics and requires all faculty and staff engaged in research to participate in ongoing Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training.
The RCR training requirement for faculty and staff is to complete one online, self-directed course (RCR 100) every three years and one collaborative, face-to-face program (RCR 200) every three years.
The myRESEARCHhome portal, funded by Duke's CTSA, puts relevant applications, resources, and information specific to you and your projects at your fingertips. Your portal's content is personalized based on your researcher profile, showing you content you want and need to see, saving you time and effort.
PCORI (the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Initiative) authorized by congress in 2010, was founded, in part, to facilitate the shift from researcher-driven to patient-centered health research. In 2013, PCORI created PCORnet (pcornet.org) to enable providers to obtain answers to pressing clinical questions more quickly and efficiently. PCORnet includes 29 individual networks that together will enable access to large amounts of clinical and health data. PCORnet will facilitate research on conditions ranging from the most common to the rare, and will engage a wide range of patients from all types of healthcare settings and systems.The intent is to reduce the time and effort it takes to launch new clinical studies while focusing on the questions and outcomes that are most important to patients.
The DCRI, with Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, is coordinating the activities of PCORnet.
By requiring that the health systems, clinicians, and patients who generate data be involved in all aspects of the governance and use of those data, PCORnet aims to facilitate the shift from researcher-driven to patient-centered research. PCORnet is still in its initial 18-month development phase. Visit the PCORnet website for more information about Clinical Data Research Networks, Patient-Powered Research Networks, Webinar educational series, and Grand Rounds.